Dissecting the Criminal Corpse: Post-Execution Punishment from the Murder Act (1752) to the Anatomy Act (1832) in England
book
posted on 2015-05-07, 10:44authored byElizabeth T. Hurren
The Murder Act (1752) is an infamous piece of penal legislation, known as the Bloody Code. It created a capital punishment system that was resented in Georgian England. An expanding medical sector relied on its penalties. Those condemned on the gallows to die for the crime of homicide were sent onwards to the dissection theatre for post-execution punishment. In a unique study, this book for the first time looks at the medico-legal aspects of the Bloody Code that have never before been examined. It examines the historical cliches that have been taken for granted in early modern studies. The central chapters reconstructs where the condemned were dissected, in what numbers, and how exactly dissection theatres in London differed from venues in the provinces and regions of England. We encounter what became known as the 'dangerous dead'. These were criminals convicted of murder that survived the gallows and had to be killed on the dissection table by penal surgeons who contravened the Hippocratic Oath. In a history of the body, historians of crime have never before examined the choreography of the legislation - social death (being condemned), legal (being hanged), and medical death (expiring in the heart, lungs and brain). Nor have they considered the fact that the boundaries of life and death were a scientific mystery. Few in fact died on the 18th century gallows. It was penal surgeons that killed the prisoner condemned 'to be hung by the neck until dead, and thence to be dissected and anatomised'. It was this set of post-execution punishments that tarnished the image of medicine over the 18th and 19th centuries. This new book has therefore wide application for historians of crime, social, legal, and medical histories of the early modern era.
History
Citation
Hurren, ET, Dissecting the Criminal Corpse: Staging Post-Execution Punishment in Early modern England, 1st edition, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016, pp. 1-300
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF ARTS, HUMANITIES AND LAW/School of History
The manuscript received an 'excellent' endorsement by external refereeing and suggested amendments were very minor. The completed manuscript was sent to the publisher and accepted on 31 July 2015. It will be copy-edited in the spring of 2016 and is scheduled for open access production in April 2016. Palgrave Macmillan has recently merged with Springer and a short delay in processing has been caused in-house whilst they merge their production systems. The main anonymous referee was very praiseworthy of the book and commented that it will make a 'major contribution...extending the work of Vic Gattrell's The Hanging Tree' in terms of its historical reach'. The report is available on request.