posted on 2014-10-21, 15:59authored byJohn R. D. Coffey
The history of Dissent has usually been written with the end in view. Church and Dissent were to become separate entities, and historians of Anglicanism and Nonconformity were inclined to write a teleological history of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, explaining why this came to pass. This was not an illegitimate approach, for one of the duties of the historian is to explain why things have come to be the way they are. But too often, weak teleology became strong teleology, and a sense of inevitability crept into the narratives. [Opening paragraph]
History
Citation
Coffey, J. R. D., ‘Church and State, 1550-1750 : The Emergence of Dissent’, in Robert Pope, ed., T&T Clark Companion to Nonconformity, T&T Clark, 2013, pp. 47-78
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF ARTS, HUMANITIES AND LAW/School of History
The file associated with this record is embargoed while permission to archive is sought from the publisher. The final published version may be available through the links above.