posted on 2016-03-16, 15:10authored bySheila E. R. Watson
Certain forms of knowledge and organisational practices and cultures prioritise dispassionate
appreciation of factual information about the past and this, in turn, masks their potential to
elucidate personal and community meanings. Emotions are regulated not only by different
cultural attitudes to events, objects, places and commemorative practices, but also by a tacit
acceptance by museums and heritage sites that some types of emotions and feelings can be
encouraged but not others, as we shall see in the case studies below. In addition the
exploration of certain non-academic or unprofessional feelings about heritage, such as those
relating to the supernatural, (which have been mostly ignored in official interpretation), helps
us to understand how communities engage with the past. It suggests that official and private
meaning making are sometimes very different and this may, in part, help to explain
indifference by some to certain forms of officially sanctioned heritage.
History
Citation
Watson, SER, Emotional engagement in heritage sites and museums: Ghosts of the past and imagination in the present, 'A Museums Studies Approach to Heritage', Routledge, 2019
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/School of Museum Studies