University of Leicester
Browse

The Latin Letters of Pseudo-Brutus (Cic. Brut. 1.16 and 1.17)

Download (28.29 MB)
Version 2 2024-03-26, 13:27
Version 1 2024-03-25, 11:20
chapter
posted on 2024-03-26, 13:27 authored by Kathryn Tempest
This chapter looks at two letters attributed to Marcus Iunius Brutus (Cicero, Ad M. Brutum 1.16 and 1.17), the dubious authenticity of which has attracted much critical attention. Following a summary of earlier scholarship, the contribution steers the debate in a different direction by arguing that these letters are instead pseudepigrapha, fictional impersonations of Brutus, composed around the first century CE. To this end, it highlights the elements of the text which betray a learned and creative author: dexterous allusions and imitations of Ciceronian style; a deep knowledge and manipulation of Brutus' own writings and of a wide range of other sources about his person and philosophical ideas; echoes of the hostile biographical tradition developed against Brutus in later times; and self-conscious meta-literary games with the conventions of epistolarity.

History

Author affiliation

College of Social Sci Arts and Humanities/Archaeology & Ancient History

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

›res vera, res ficta‹: Fictionality in Ancient Epistolography

Volume

149

Pagination

131 - 160

Publisher

De Gruyter

isbn

9783111308494

Copyright date

2023

Available date

2024-09-18

Book series

Trends in Classics - Supplementary Volumes

Language

en

Deposited by

Dr Kathryn Tempest

Deposit date

2024-03-22

Rights Retention Statement

  • No

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC