posted on 2019-06-14, 11:11authored byEmma Wilson, Mike Anderson, David Prendergasty, David Cheneler
The production of accurate detector models is of high importance in the development and use of detectors. Initially, MCNP and Geant were developed to specialise in neutral particle models and accelerator models, respectively; there is now a greater overlap of the capabilities of both, and it is therefore useful to produce comparative models to evaluate detector characteristics. In a collaboration between Lancaster University, UK, and Innovative Physics Ltd., UK, models have been developed in both MCNP6 and Geant4 of Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CdZnTe) detectors developed by Innovative Physics Ltd. Herein, a comparison is made of the relative strengths of MCNP6 and Geant4 for modelling neutron flux and secondary γ-ray emission. Given the increasing overlap of the modelling capabilities of MCNP6 and Geant4, it is worthwhile to comment on differences in results for simulations which have similarities in terms of geometries and source configurations.
Funding
This work is supported by the Engineering and Physical
Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), UK, via the Impact
Acceleration Account (IAA), in a collaboration between Lancaster University and Innovative Physics Ltd. The contributions of the Lancaster University technical staff are gratefully
acknowledged.
History
Citation
EPJ Web of Conferences, 2018, 170, 08008, ANIMMA 2017 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING/Department of Mathematics
Source
ANIMMA 2017 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications, Liège, Belgium