University of Leicester
Browse
- No file added yet -

FREQUENCY OF MEDICAL OUT-PATIENT VISITS AND USE OF HOME BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS IN FIVE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

conference contribution
posted on 2024-05-16, 12:28 authored by Michel Burnier, Michel Azizi, Alexandre Persu, Aleksander Prejbisz, Vitoria Cunha, Pankaj Gupta, Jan Vaclavik, Jorie Versmissen, Reinhold Kreutz

Objective: We assessed the frequency of out-patient visits for hypertension and the use of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) in 5 European countries.

Design and method: We used the data of a web-based questionnaire developed by the Working group on Lifestyle, Cardiovascular Therapy and Adherence to investigate patients’ perspectives on hypertension management. Eligible participants were adult men and women, living in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and UK, with a confirmed diagnosis of hypertension. Data were collected through patients’ organizations and internet from January to March 2022.

Results: From January to March 2022, we included 2757 participants, 46% women, 94% older than 60 y, 71% with hypertension duration >5y, 95% (91% for >3 months) treated with a mean of 1.7 antihypertensive pills /day (all medications: 4.1 pills/day). The out-patient visit frequency was monthly in 3% of the participants, once every 1 to 3 months in 23%, once every 3 to 6 months in 28%, once every 6 to 12 months in 30%, and less than once a year in 13%. There was large between-country variability in visit frequency (e.g., once every 1 to 3 months: 5% in UK, 21% in Germany, and 42% France; once every 6 to 12 months: 47% in UK, 23% in Germany, and 13% in France). Overall, 67% of participants performed HBPM themselves and 13% with an external help. HBPM was done on a regular basis in most patients (17% every day, 26% several times a week, 35% several times a month) while 8% did HBPM only when not feeling well. HBPM was performed more frequently in Germany and less in UK. Patients at higher cardiovascular risk did HBPM more frequently.

Conclusions: There are no strong evidence-based recommendations on the frequency of out-patient visits for hypertension during long-term follow-up. Our survey shows a large variability between European countries in the way patients are followed. Moreover, strong implementation of HBPM is found in all countries, but the ESH protocol is not strictly followed. Therefore, studies are needed to define the most cost-effective hypertension follow-up and ESH recommendations for HBPM should be reinforced.

History

Author affiliation

Organisation Organisation/College of Life Sciences Organisation/College of Life Sciences/Cardiovascular Sciences

Published in

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION

Volume

41

Pagination

E68 - E68

Publisher

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins

issn

0263-6352

eissn

1473-5598

Copyright date

2023

Notes

Conference Oral Session

Language

en

Deposited by

Mr Pankaj Gupta

Deposit date

2024-05-02

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC