posted on 2019-10-07, 12:29authored byMarina Sanchez-Bayton, Erwan Tréguier, Miguel Herraiz, Patrick Martin, Akos Kereszturi, Beatriz Sanchez-CanoBeatriz Sanchez-Cano
<div><p>This data set contains geophysics
derived data from the MOLA altimeter on board Mars Global Surveyor mission. It
contains morphometric information, as well as topographic profiles from 201
edifices (positive topographic elevations) analysed from the North Polar region
of Mars. Specifically, from the Scandia Cavi and Olympia Undae regions.</p><p><br></p>
<p> </p>
<p><b><u>This data set accompanies the following
paper:</u></b></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Sánchez-Bayton, M., Tréguier, E.,
Herraiz, M., Martin, P., Kereszturi, A., and Sánchez-Cano, B.,
(2019), New Landforms in Scandia Cavi and Olympia Undae, North Polar
Region of Mars. Discrimination of possible volcanoes edifices. Journal of
Geophysical Research Planets, 124, (awaiting for DOI).</p><p><br></p>
<p> </p>
<p><u><b>Abstract:</b></u></p>
<p>A survey of edifices on Olympia
Undae sand sea and Scandia Cavi in the northern circumpolar region of Mars has
been performed using images from Mars Express, Mars Global Surveyor, and
Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. These are key areas for the evolution of the
Northern Polar cap as they can cast light on the gypsum formation process that
occur in there, which is essential for liquid water. This study has led to
identifying 201 elevated edifices,<i> </i>more than 90% of them not
classified before, with diameters between 6 and 86 km. Considering their
morphometric parameters and image-based appearances, these positive
topographic features have been classified into five categories: cratered
cones, impact craters, and simple, irregular, and peaked domes. Cratered cones
and impact craters include all crater shaped edifices and are
far more numerous than the dome-shaped ones. 100 of
130 crater-shaped edifices are probably not impact craters,
although can be erroneously taken as eroded remnants of earlier craters of this
type. Regarding their origin, different types of formation processes are
evaluated.<i> </i>There is not a unique definite origin as they could be
explained by various causes, such as impact craters, mud domes, pingos and
volcanic activity, although the main cause seems to be either
hydrothermal or volcanic nature. The formation mechanism and their potential
role on volcanic activity can cast light on the geological evolution of this
region and its ice and water-related history, which might be
connected to the formation of gypsum and to the volcanic deposits found
inside craters.</p>
<p> </p><br></div>