posted on 2016-12-14, 10:05authored byF. C. Hamdy, J. L. Donovan, J. A. Lane, M. Mason, C. Metcalfe, P. Holding, M. Davis, T. J. Peters, E. L. Turner, R. M. Martin, J. Oxley, M. Robinson, J. Staffurth, E. Walsh, P. Bollina, J. Catto, A. Doble, A. Doherty, D. Gillatt, Roger Kockelbergh, H. Kynaston, A. Paul, P. Powell, S. Prescott, D. J. Rosario, E. Rowe, D. E. Neal, ProtecT Study Group
BACKGROUND
The comparative effectiveness of treatments for prostate cancer that is detected by prostate-specific
antigen (PSA) testing remains uncertain.
METHODS
We compared active monitoring, radical prostatectomy, and external-beam radiotherapy for
the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Between 1999 and 2009, a total of
82,429 men 50 to 69 years of age received a PSA test; 2664 received a diagnosis of localized
prostate cancer, and 1643 agreed to undergo randomization to active monitoring (545 men),
surgery (553), or radiotherapy (545). The primary outcome was prostate-cancer mortality
at a median of 10 years of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the rates of disease
progression, metastases, and all-cause deaths.
RESULTS
There were 17 prostate-cancer–specific deaths overall: 8 in the active-monitoring group (1.5
deaths per 1000 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7 to 3.0), 5 in the surgery
group (0.9 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.2), and 4 in the radiotherapy group
(0.7 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 0.3 to 2.0); the difference among the groups was not
significant (P=0.48 for the overall comparison). In addition, no significant difference was
seen among the groups in the number of deaths from any cause (169 deaths overall; P=0.87
for the comparison among the three groups). Metastases developed in more men in the
active-monitoring group (33 men; 6.3 events per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 4.5 to 8.8)
than in the surgery group (13 men; 2.4 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.2) or the
radiotherapy group (16 men; 3.0 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 1.9 to 4.9) (P=0.004 for
the overall comparison). Higher rates of disease progression were seen in the active-monitoring
group (112 men; 22.9 events per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 19.0 to 27.5) than in
the surgery group (46 men; 8.9 events per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 6.7 to 11.9) or the
radiotherapy group (46 men; 9.0 events per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 6.7 to 12.0) (P<0.001
for the overall comparison).
CONCLUSIONS
At a median of 10 years, prostate-cancer–specific mortality was low irrespective of the treatment
assigned, with no significant difference among treatments. Surgery and radiotherapy
were associated with lower incidences of disease progression and metastases than was
active monitoring. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research; ProtecT Current
Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN20141297; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02044172.)
Funding
Supported by the U.K. National Institute for Health Research
Health Technology Assessment Programme (NIHR HTA: projects
96/20/06, 96/20/99, with the University of Oxford as sponsor).
Dr. Donovan is supported by the NIHR Collaboration for
Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West, hosted
by University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, and Dr.
Hamdy is supported by the Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research
Centre Surgical Innovation and Evaluation Theme and the Cancer
Research U.K. Oxford Centre.