posted on 2019-06-10, 08:52authored byMW Orme, MC Steiner, MD Morgan, AP Kingsnorth, DW Esliger, SJ Singh, LB Sherar
Background: The constructs and interdependency of physical behaviors are not well described and the complexity of physical activity (PA) data analysis remains unexplored in COPD. This study examined the interrelationships of 24-hour physical behaviors and investigated their associations with participant characteristics for individuals with mild–moderate airflow obstruction and healthy control subjects.
Patients and methods: Vigorous PA (VPA), moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), light PA (LPA), stationary time (ST), average movement intensity (vector magnitude counts per minute), and sleep duration for 109 individuals with COPD and 135 healthy controls were obtained by wrist-worn accelerometry. Principal components analysis (PCA) examined interrelationships of physical behaviors to identify distinct behavioral constructs. Using the PCA component loadings, linear regressions examined associations with participant (+, positive correlation; -, negative correlation), and were compared between COPD and healthy control groups.
Results: For both groups PCA revealed ST, LPA, and average movement intensity as distinct behavioral constructs to MVPA and VPA, labeled “low-intensity movement” and “high-intensity movement,” respectively. Sleep was also found to be its own distinct behavioral construct. Results from linear regressions supported the identification of distinct behavioral constructs from PCA. In COPD, low-intensity movement was associated with limitations with mobility (-), daily activities (-), health status (+), and body mass index (BMI) (-) independent of high-intensity movement and sleep. High-intensity movement was associated with age (-) and self-care limitations (-) independent of low-intensity movement and sleep. Sleep was associated with gender (0= female, 1= male; [-]), lung function (-), and percentage body fat (+) independent of low-intensity and high-intensity movement.
Conclusion: Distinct behavioral constructs comprising the 24-hour day were identified as “low-intensity movement,” “high-intensity movement,” and “sleep” with each construct independently associated with different participant characteristics. Future research should determine whether modifying these behaviors improves health outcomes in COPD.
Funding
The study was funded by facilitation funds from the NHS
England. The authors acknowledge support from the National
Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical
Research Center, which is a partnership between University
Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Loughborough University,
and the University of Leicester and acknowledge support from
the NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health
Research and Care – East Midlands and The Primary Care
Research Network (PCRN).
History
Citation
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 2019, 14, pp. 419-430 (12)
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation
Version
VoR (Version of Record)
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
The PhARaoH data have been described and made available
indefinitely, on request. For conditions of use, please visit
the following web link: http://www.lboro.ac.uk/research/
mi-lab/research/pharaoh/pharaohconditionsofuse/. To make
an enquiry about using this dataset, please submit a request
by visiting the following web link: http://www.lboro.ac.uk/
research/mi-lab/research/pharaoh/. Study documentation,
including informed consent form, participant information
sheet, and monitor instruction sheet are available on request.