University of Leicester
Browse
- No file added yet -

3D tooth microwear texture analysis in fishes as a test of dietary hypotheses of durophagy

Download (1.29 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-02-04, 11:13 authored by Mark A. Purnell, Laurent P. G. Darras
An understanding of how extinct animals functioned underpins our understanding of past evolutionary events, including adaptive radiations, and the role of functional innovation and adaptation as drivers of both micro- and macroevolution. Yet analysis of function in extinct animals is fraught with difficulty. Hypotheses that interpret molariform teeth in fishes as evidence of durophagous (shell-crushing) diets provide a good example of the particular problems inherent in the methods of functional morphology. This is because the assumed close coupling of form and function upon which the approach is based is weakened by, among other things, behavioural flexibility and the absence of a clear one to one relationship between structures and functions. Here we show that ISO 25178-2 standard parameters for surface texture, derived from analysis of worn surfaces of molariform teeth of fishes, vary significantly between species that differ in the amount of hard-shelled prey they consume. Two populations of the Sheepshead Seabream (Archosargus probatocephalus) were studied. This fish is not a dietary specialist, and one of the populations is known to consume more vegetation and less hard-shelled prey than the other; this is reflected in significant differences in their microwear textures. The Archosargus populations differ significantly in their microwear from the specialist shell-crusher Anarhichas lupus (the Atlantic Wolffish). Multivariate analysis of these three groups of fishes lends further support to the relationship between diet and tooth microwear, and provides robust validation of the approach. Application of the multivariate models derived from microwear texture in Archosargus and Anarhichas to a third fish species—the cichlid Astatoreochromis alluaudi—successfully separates wild caught fish that ate hard-shelled prey from lab-raised fish that did not. This cross-taxon validation demonstrates that quantitative analysis of tooth microwear texture can differentiate between fishes with different diets even when they range widely in size, habitat, and in the structure of their trophic apparatus. The approach thus has great potential as an additional tool for dietary analysis in extant fishes, and for testing dietary hypotheses in ancient and extinct species.

Funding

The authors would like to thank Dr Ralph Turingan from the Florida Institute of Technology for providing the samples of Archosargus, Dr David Baines for access to the samples of Anarhichas and Rob Goodall for comments on the ms. Funded in part by Natural Environment Research Council grants NE/B000125/1 and NE/G018189/1.

History

Citation

Surface Topography: Metrology and Properties , 2016, 4 (1), 014006

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING/School of Geography, Geology and the Environment

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Surface Topography: Metrology and Properties

Publisher

IOP Publishing

issn

2051-672X

Acceptance date

2015-11-13

Copyright date

2015

Available date

2019-02-04

Publisher version

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2051-672X/4/1/014006/meta

Notes

Supplementary material for this article is available online http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2051-672X/4/1/014006

Language

en