University of Leicester
Browse

ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people

Download (456.65 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-12-11, 16:23 authored by Terence Ong, Ana Suazo Di Paola, Cassandra BrookesCassandra Brookes, Avril Drummond, Paul Hendrick, Paul Leighton, Matthew Jones, Khalid Salem, Nasir Quraishi, Opinder Sahota
ObjectiveTo determine the feasibility of designing and conducting a definitive trial to evaluate the effectiveness of sacral fracture fixation compared with non-surgical management among older people admitted with a lateral compression pelvic fragility fracture (PFF).DesignSingle-site, parallel, two-arm randomised controlled feasibility trial.SettingA UK tertiary centre hospital.ParticipantsPatients aged ≥70 years who were ambulating pre-injury requiring hospital admission (within 28 days of injury) with a type 1 lateral compression PFF.InterventionsThe intervention group received sacral fracture fixation (cement augmentation±screw fixation) within 7 days of randomisation. Routine preoperative and postoperative care followed each surgical intervention. The control group received usual care consisting of analgesia, and regular input from the medical and therapy team.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe feasibility outcomes were the number of eligible patients, willingness to be randomised, adherence to allocated treatment, retention, data on the completeness and variability of the proposed definitive trial outcome measures, and reported adverse events.Results241 patients were screened. 13 (5.4%) were deemed eligible to participate. Among the eligible participants, nine (69.2%) were willing to participate. Five participants were randomised to the intervention group and four to the control group. The clinicians involved were willing to allow their patients to be randomised and adhere to the allocated treatment. One participant in the intervention group and two participants in the control group received their allocated treatment. All participants were followed up until 12 weeks post-randomisation, and had an additional safety follow-up assessment at 12 months. Overall, the proportion of completeness of outcome measures was at least 75%. No adverse events were directly related to the trial.ConclusionsThere were significant challenges in recruiting sufficient participants which will need to be addressed prior to a definitive trial.Trial registration numberISRCTN16719542.

History

Author affiliation

College of Life Sciences Professional Services

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

BMJ Open

Volume

12

Issue

5

Pagination

e050535

Publisher

BMJ

issn

2044-6055

eissn

2044-6055

Copyright date

2024

Available date

2024-12-11

Spatial coverage

England

Language

en

Deposited by

Mrs Cassey Brookes

Deposit date

2024-12-10

Data Access Statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available upon request from the Chief Investigator Professor Opinder Sahota (Opinder.Sahota@nuh.nhs.uk).

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC