Version 2 2022-03-18, 12:51Version 2 2022-03-18, 12:51
Version 1 2019-10-18, 08:50Version 1 2019-10-18, 08:50
journal contribution
posted on 2022-03-18, 12:51authored byMahmoud Marzouk
This study represents a challenging departure from the mainstream literature by developing an
in-depth understanding of and a framework for CRD quality. This is the first study to investigate
the various aspects of CRD from a multi-stakeholder perspective using semi-structured
interviews. The findings reveal a lack of a common definition of risk and highlight the
importance of CRD. The results indicate that CRD has improved, yet there is considerable room
for improvement. The findings also demonstrate a number of incentives and disincentives that
could explain managers’ CRD decisions. The FASB’s qualitative characteristics have been
operationalised and a framework has been developed to help improve and assess CRD quality.
This study has important implications for CRD policy, practice and research.