A Psychometric Evaluation of Professional Quality of Life Scale Version 5 (ProQOL 5) in a UK-Based Sample of Allied Mental Health Professionals
The Professional Quality of Life Scale Version 5 (ProQOL 5; Stamm, 2010) is often used to assess burnout, secondary traumatic stress, and compassion satisfaction in allied mental health professionals in the UK. However, vital empirical evidence assessing psychometric properties of this instrument for this occupational group or in this national context does not exist. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to conduct a confirmatory factor analysis to validate ProQOL 5 in a sample of 366 UK-based clinical psychologists, counsellors, and psychotherapists recruited via online purposive sampling. The findings indicated that in alignment with existing research, the original three-factor structure demonstrated poor fit to data. Thus, the structure was investigated further with a novel technique in network psychometrics called bootstrapped exploratory graph analysis (bootEGA). The results indicated that 21 items from the original 30-item ProQOL 5 demonstrated satisfactory levels of item stability, i.e., all items were replicated in more than 80% of bootstrapped samples. The present study is the first to evaluate the internal structure of ProQOL 5 in a sample of mental health professionals based in the UK.
History
Author affiliation
College of Social Sci Arts and Humanities/School of BusinessVersion
- VoR (Version of Record)
Published in
Current PsychologyVolume
43Pagination
21615–21629Publisher
Springer (part of Springer Nature)issn
1046-1310eissn
1936-4733Copyright date
2024Available date
2024-10-15Publisher DOI
Language
enPublisher version
Deposited by
Professor Maria Karanika-MurrayDeposit date
2024-04-11Data Access Statement
The research data for this article is deposited on the institutional Data Archive (DOI of the dataset is not included in this version for blind peer-review), available to bona fide researchers with confirmed ethical consent. To arrange to access a copy of this research data set, contact the Library Research Support team: [email address is not included in this version for blind peer-review].Rights Retention Statement
- No