University of Leicester
Browse

A Randomized Crossover Trial on the Effects of Cadence on Calf Raise Test Outcomes: Cadence Does Matter

Download (749.46 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-03-19, 10:00 authored by Kim Hébert-Losier, Ma Roxanne Fernandez, Josie Athens, Masayoshi Kubo, Seth O’Neill
The calf raise test (CRT) is commonly used to assess triceps surae muscle-tendon unit function. Often, a metronome set to 60 beats/min (30 repetitions/min) is used to set the cadence of calf raise repetitions, but studies report using cadences ranging from 30 to 120 beats/min. We investigated the effect of cadence on CRT outcomes, accounting for the potential confounders of sex, age, body mass index, and physical activity. Thirty-six healthy individuals (50% female) performed single-leg calf raise repetitions to volitional exhaustion in 3 randomized cadence conditions, 7 days apart: 30, 60, and 120 beats/min. Repetitions, total vertical displacement, total work, peak height, and peak power were recorded using the validated Calf Raise application. Cadence significantly affected all CRT outcomes (P ≤ .008), except repetitions (P = .200). Post hoc analysis revealed 60 beats/min resulted in significantly greater total vertical displacement and work than 30 and 120 beats/min. Peak height was greater at 60 and 120 than 30 beats/min, and peak power was greater at 120 beats/min. Males generated greater work and peak power (P ≤ .001), whereas individuals with greater body mass index completed less repetitions (P = .008), achieved lower total vertical displacements (P = .003), and generated greater peak power (P = .005). CRT cadence is important to consider when interpreting CRT outcomes and comparing data between studies.

History

Author affiliation

College of Life Sciences Healthcare

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Journal of Applied Biomechanics

Publisher

Human Kinetics

issn

1065-8483

eissn

1543-2688

Copyright date

2025

Available date

2025-03-19

Spatial coverage

United States

Language

eng

Deposited by

Dr Seth O'Neill

Deposit date

2025-03-14

Data Access Statement

To foster transparency and support reproducibility, data have been made openly available in the Open Science Framework at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EJN87.

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC