A comparative study on fatigue indicator parameters for near‐α titanium alloys

Nucleation of in‐service cracks leads to detrimental consequences for structural components of near‐α titanium alloys subjected to fatigue loads. Experimental observations show that the fatigue initiation facets usually form in certain crystallographic orientation ranges of “hard” primary α grains which differ between pure and dwell fatigue loads. In this manuscript, a comparative study has been performed using several fatigue indicator parameters (FIPs) to assess their ability to predict the location of fatigue crack nucleation in near‐α titanium alloy microstructures. All selected FIPs are implemented within the same polycrystalline plasticity finite element modeling framework to facilitate one‐to‐one comparisons. Comparison on predictability of critical initiation locations and their crystallographic orientations is studied for incorporated FIPs under pure and dwell fatigue. The critical locations predicted by some FIPs were found to be close to each other, and consistent with the crystallographic orientation ranges from fractography measurements, in addition to the range transition from pure to dwell fatigue loads. Critical locations from slip driven FIPs are obtained to be several grains away from that of the former ones and are inclined to capture orientations of slip traces from experiments.