University of Leicester
Browse

A creeping intracontinental thrust fault: past and present slip-rates on the Northern edge of the Tien Shan, Kazakhstan

Download (47.79 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-08-30, 09:06 authored by D Mackenzie, R Walker, K Abdrakhmatov, G Campbell, A Carr, C Gruetzner, A Mukambayev, M Rizza
We demonstrate that a continental interior reverse fault is deforming by aseismic creep, presently, and likely also in the long term. The Karkara Rangefront Fault, part of the larger Main Terskey Front, forms the northern boundary of the high Terskey Tien Shan in southeastern Kazakhstan and is a mature structure with evidence for high slip rates throughout the late Cenozoic. Combining field studies with a satellite stereo-image derived digital elevation model (2 m resolution), we map a series of fluvial terraces along the rangefront which are uplifted by up to ∼300 m above the present river level. Radiocarbon ages from one catchment constrain the ages of the lowermost two terraces to be ∼4–5 ka and ∼10–15 ka, consistent with prominent, regionally extensive terraces observed elsewhere in the Tien Shan. Based on conservative estimates for the fault dip under the displaced terraces, we estimate a slip rate along the fault plane of 3.5+1.7 −0.4 mm yr–1 on the Karkara Rangefront Fault and a further >0.8 mm yr–1 on a fold structure in the Kegen basin that we infer is driven by a detachment from the main rangefront. We therefore estimate a minimum shortening rate across the rangefront of 1.1–3.3 mm yr–1. Elastic modelling of the regional GPS velocity field suggests that the fault is presently creeping at ∼3 mm yr–1 (horizontal shortening), consistent with the upper limit of our Late Quaternary slip rate estimate. This is the fastest known slip rate in the northern Tien Shan and the only individual structure resolved in the regional velocity field. At present the fault is accumulating minimal strain, and there is evidence in the geomorphology that this creep is sustained in the long term, but whether or not it is also capable of generating earthquakes requires further study.

Funding

This work was supported by funding from the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) through the Looking Inside the Continents (LiCS) project (NE/K011006/1), the Earthquake without Frontiers (EwF) project (EwF_NE/J02001X/1_1), and the Centre for the Observation and Modelling of Earthquakes, Volcanoes and Tectonics (COMET) project (COME30001, http://comet.nerc.ac.uk). RTW also acknowledges support from the Royal Society. Many of the figures were made using the public domain software Generic Mapping Tools (Wessel & Smith 1998). Analysis and visualization of the DEMs and elevation pointclouds was performed using the KeckCaves virtual reality software suite. KOMPSAT imagery was provided by the European Space Agency through category 1 allocation C1P.6462.

History

Citation

Geophysical Journal International, 2018, 215 (2), pp. 1148-1170 (23)

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING/School of Geography, Geology and the Environment/Physical Geography

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Geophysical Journal International

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP), Royal Astronomical Society

issn

0956-540X

eissn

1365-246X

Acceptance date

2018-08-16

Copyright date

2018

Available date

2019-08-30

Publisher version

https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/215/2/1148/5075585

Notes

Supplementary data are available at GJI online https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/215/2/1148/5075585#supplementary-data Figure S1. Hammer seismic refraction model for profile C. We see a displacement in the high velocity deeper material (most likely consolidated Neogene) of ∼2 m. 2x vertical exaggeration. Possible fault orientation and location shown in purple (20°). Figure S1. Maps and profiles for each of the sites Rc4–Rc6. The mapped terrace colours correspond to the profile smoothed lines, and common colours indicate terraces correlated between catchments. Fault scarps are shown in green—at each site, secondary scarps are seen 1–2  km further back from the primary scarp.

Language

en