University of Leicester
LRA_Gunn,+Burgess+and+Maltby+(2018).pdf (597.53 kB)
Download file

A factor analysis of Functional Independence and Functional Assessment Measure scores among focal and diffuse brain injury patients: The importance of bi-factor models.

Download (597.53 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2018-05-25, 11:17 authored by Sarah Gunn, Gerald H. Burgess, John Maltby
OBJECTIVE: To explore the factor structure of the UK Functional Independence Measure and Functional Assessment Measure (FIM+FAM) among focal and diffuse acquired brain injury patients. DESIGN: Criterion standard. SETTING: An NHS acute acquired brain injury inpatient rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Referred sample of 447 adults (835 cases after exclusions) admitted for inpatient treatment following an acquired brain injury significant enough to justify intensive inpatient neurorehabilitation. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. OUTCOME MEASURE: Functional Independence Measure and Functional Assessment Measure. RESULTS: Exploratory Factor Analysis suggested a two-factor structure to FIM+FAM scores, among both focal-proximate and diffuse-proximate acquired brain injury aetiologies. Confirmatory Factor Analysis suggested a three-factor bi-factor structure presented the best fit of the FIM+FAM score data across both aetiologies. However, across both analyses, a convergence was found towards a general factor, demonstrated by high correlations between factors in the Exploratory Factor Analysis, and by a general factor explaining the majority of the variance in scores on Confirmatory Factor Analysis. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggested that although factors describing specific functional domains can be derived from FIM+FAM item scores, there is a convergence towards a single factor describing overall functioning. This single factor informs the specific group factors (e.g. motor, psychosocial and communication function) following brain injury. Further research into the comparative value of the general and group factors as evaluative/prognostic measures is indicated.



Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2018

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/Biological Sciences/Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour


  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation


Elsevier for American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine



Acceptance date


Copyright date


Available date


Publisher version!/content/playContent/1-s2.0-S0003999318302740?returnurl=


The file associated with this record is under embargo until 12 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.



Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications