University of Leicester
Browse

A family of process-based models to simulate landscape use by multiple taxa

Download (3.47 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-26, 09:47 authored by Emma Gardner, Robert A Robinson, Angela Julian, Katherine Boughey, Steve Langham, Jenny Tse-Leon, Sergei Petrovskii, David J Baker, Chloe Bellamy, Andrew Buxton, Samantha Franks, Chris Monk, Nicola Morris, Kirsty J Park, Silviu Petrovan, Katie Pitt, Rachel Taylor, Rebecca K Turner, Steven JR Allain, Val Bradley, Richard K Broughton, Mandy Cartwright, Kevin Clarke, Jon Cranfield, Elisa Fuentes-Montemayor, Robert Gandola, Tony Gent, Shelley A Hinsley, Thomas Madsen, Chris Reading, John W Redhead, Sonia Reveley, John Wilkinson, Carol Williams, Ian Woodward, John Baker, Philip Briggs, Sheila Dyason, Steve Langton, Ashlea Mawby, Richard F Pywell, James M Bullock

Context Land-use change is a key driver of biodiversity loss. Models that accurately predict how biodiversity might be affected by land-use changes are urgently needed, to help avoid further negative impacts and inform landscape-scale restoration projects. To be effective, such models must balance model realism with computational tractability and must represent the different habitat and connectivity requirements of multiple species. Objectives We explored the extent to which process-based modelling might fulfil this role, examining feasibility for different taxa and potential for informing real-world decision-making. Methods We developed a family of process-based models (*4pop) that simulate landscape use by birds, bats, reptiles and amphibians, derived from the well-established poll4pop model (designed to simulate bee populations). Given landcover data, the models predict spatially-explicit relative abundance by simulating optimal home-range foraging, reproduction, dispersal of offspring and mortality. The models were co-developed by researchers, conservation NGOs and volunteer surveyors, parameterised using literature data and expert opinion, and validated against observational datasets collected across Great Britain. Results The models were able to simulate habitat specialists, generalists, and species requiring access to multiple habitats for different types of resources (e.g. breeding vs foraging). We identified model refinements required for some taxa and considerations for modelling further species/groups. Conclusions We suggest process-based models that integrate multiple forms of knowledge can assist biodiversity-inclusive decision-making by predicting habitat use throughout the year, expanding the range of species that can be modelled, and enabling decision-makers to better account for landscape context and habitat configuration effects on population persistence.

Funding

How many trees should we plant and where? Modelling the landscape-level benefits and biodiversity consequences of woodland creation.

UK Research and Innovation

Find out more...

History

Author affiliation

College of Science & Engineering Comp' & Math' Sciences

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Landscape Ecology

Volume

39

Issue

5

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

issn

0921-2973

eissn

1572-9761

Copyright date

2024

Available date

2024-06-26

Language

en

Deposited by

Professor Sergei Petrovskiy

Deposit date

2024-06-26

Data Access Statement

All *4pop models are being made freely available from the Environmental Information Data Centre. Observational datasets used for model validation are available on request from British Trust for Ornithology, Bat Conservation Trust, Amphibian and Reptile Groups of UK, Surrey Amphibian and Reptile Group, and Froglife.

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC