posted on 2024-06-26, 09:47authored byEmma Gardner, Robert A Robinson, Angela Julian, Katherine Boughey, Steve Langham, Jenny Tse-Leon, Sergei Petrovskii, David J Baker, Chloe Bellamy, Andrew Buxton, Samantha Franks, Chris Monk, Nicola Morris, Kirsty J Park, Silviu Petrovan, Katie Pitt, Rachel Taylor, Rebecca K Turner, Steven JR Allain, Val Bradley, Richard K Broughton, Mandy Cartwright, Kevin Clarke, Jon Cranfield, Elisa Fuentes-Montemayor, Robert Gandola, Tony Gent, Shelley A Hinsley, Thomas Madsen, Chris Reading, John W Redhead, Sonia Reveley, John Wilkinson, Carol Williams, Ian Woodward, John Baker, Philip Briggs, Sheila Dyason, Steve Langton, Ashlea Mawby, Richard F Pywell, James M Bullock
<p dir="ltr">Context Land-use change is a key driver of biodiversity loss. Models that accurately predict how biodiversity might be affected by land-use changes are urgently needed, to help avoid further negative impacts and inform landscape-scale restoration projects. To be effective, such models must balance model realism with computational tractability and must represent the different habitat and connectivity requirements of multiple species. Objectives We explored the extent to which process-based modelling might fulfil this role, examining feasibility for different taxa and potential for informing real-world decision-making. Methods We developed a family of process-based models (*4pop) that simulate landscape use by birds, bats, reptiles and amphibians, derived from the well-established poll4pop model (designed to simulate bee populations). Given landcover data, the models predict spatially-explicit relative abundance by simulating optimal home-range foraging, reproduction, dispersal of offspring and mortality. The models were co-developed by researchers, conservation NGOs and volunteer surveyors, parameterised using literature data and expert opinion, and validated against observational datasets collected across Great Britain. Results The models were able to simulate habitat specialists, generalists, and species requiring access to multiple habitats for different types of resources (e.g. breeding vs foraging). We identified model refinements required for some taxa and considerations for modelling further species/groups. Conclusions We suggest process-based models that integrate multiple forms of knowledge can assist biodiversity-inclusive decision-making by predicting habitat use throughout the year, expanding the range of species that can be modelled, and enabling decision-makers to better account for landscape context and habitat configuration effects on population persistence.</p>
Funding
How many trees should we plant and where? Modelling the landscape-level benefits and biodiversity consequences of woodland creation.
All *4pop models are being made freely available from the Environmental Information Data Centre. Observational datasets used for model validation are available on request from British Trust for Ornithology, Bat Conservation Trust, Amphibian and Reptile Groups of UK, Surrey Amphibian and Reptile Group, and Froglife.