University of Leicester
Browse
Ciani et al eClinicalMedicine2023.pdf (554.09 kB)

A framework for the definition and interpretation of the use of surrogate endpoints in interventional trials

Download (554.09 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-12-08, 16:31 authored by O Ciani, AM Manyara, P Davies, D Stewart, CJ Weir, AE Young, J Blazeby, NJ Butcher, S Bujkiewicz, AW Chan, D Dawoud, M Offringa, M Ouwens, A Hróbjartssson, A Amstutz, L Bertolaccini, VD Bruno, D Devane, CDCM Faria, PB Gilbert, R Harris, M Lassere, L Marinelli, S Markham, JH Powers, Y Rezaei, L Richert, F Schwendicke, LG Tereshchenko, A Thoma, A Turan, A Worrall, R Christensen, GS Collins, JS Ross, RS Taylor

Background

Interventional trials that evaluate treatment effects using surrogate endpoints have become increasingly common. This paper describes four linked empirical studies and the development of a framework for defining, interpreting and reporting surrogate endpoints in trials.


Methods

As part of developing the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) and SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) extensions for randomised trials reporting surrogate endpoints, we undertook a scoping review, e-Delphi study, consensus meeting, and a web survey to examine current definitions and stakeholder (including clinicians, trial investigators, patients and public partners, journal editors, and health technology experts) interpretations of surrogate endpoints as primary outcome measures in trials.


Findings

Current surrogate endpoint definitional frameworks are inconsistent and unclear. Surrogate endpoints are used in trials as a substitute of the treatment effects of an intervention on the target outcome(s) of ultimate interest, events measuring how patients feel, function, or survive. Traditionally the consideration of surrogate endpoints in trials has focused on biomarkers (e.g., HDL cholesterol, blood pressure, tumour response), especially in the medical product regulatory setting. Nevertheless, the concept of surrogacy in trials is potentially broader. Intermediate outcomes that include a measure of function or symptoms (e.g., angina frequency, exercise tolerance) can also be used as substitute for target outcomes (e.g., all-cause mortality)—thereby acting as surrogate endpoints. However, we found a lack of consensus among stakeholders on accepting and interpreting intermediate outcomes in trials as surrogate endpoints or target outcomes. In our assessment, patients and health technology assessment experts appeared more likely to consider intermediate outcomes to be surrogate endpoints than clinicians and regulators.


Interpretation

There is an urgent need for better understanding and reporting on the use of surrogate endpoints, especially in the setting of interventional trials. We provide a framework for the definition of surrogate endpoints (biomarkers and intermediate outcomes) and target outcomes in trials to improve future reporting and aid stakeholders' interpretation and use of trial surrogate endpoint evidence.

Funding

Reporting of randomised trials using surrogate outcomes: development of extensions to the CONSORT 2010 and SPIRIT 2013 guidance statements

Medical Research Council

Find out more...

History

Author affiliation

Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

eClinicalMedicine

Volume

65

Pagination

102283

Publisher

Elsevier BV

issn

2589-5370

eissn

2589-5370

Copyright date

2023

Available date

2023-12-08

Spatial coverage

England

Language

eng

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC