posted on 2019-08-19, 09:02authored byL.L.B. Graham, S.E. Page
Carbon-rich tropical peat swamp forests (PSFs) are being degraded at an alarming rate. In response to national
and global agendas, landscape-scale PSF restoration is underway, although supporting knowledge of PSF
ecosystem restoration ecology remains limited. Seed banks are usually an important source of natural
regeneration and crucial in post-degradation forest recovery, even in the humid tropics where reduced seed
dormancy leads to typically smaller seed banks than in temperate regions. It has been assumed that PSF
degradation reduces the seed bank, limiting natural regeneration, but this has not previously been investigated
explicitly. This study of PSF in Central Kalimantan explored seed bank prevalence and regenerative capacity
across five forest zones (FZs): degraded, open canopy disturbed, edge, closed canopy disturbed and natural.
Numbers and species of seeds and seedlings were recorded from surface peat samples collected from each FZ
over one year. Seed density, averaged across FZs, was 41 seeds m-2
; total species number was 11; and seedling
density was 16.0–73.6 m-2 depending on FZ. These values were much lower than for other forests in this region.
There was little difference in seed bank size between natural and degraded FZs, and only the forest edge
showed higher than expected seed bank regenerative capability. Overall, our results suggest that seed banks
are not of high importance in tropical PSF regeneration, either before or after degradation. These findings are
discussed from the perspective of successional traits in different species and their relevance to ecosystem
restoration.
Funding
We would like to thank the field team that helped to
collect the data: Andri Thomas, Salahuddin and Eben
Eser. We also thank Minstry of Research,
Technology and Higher Education, Indonesia,
(RISTEK) for allowing this research to go ahead, and
Center for International Management of Tropical
Peatlands (UPT LLG CIMTROP) and the Borneo
Nature Foundation (BNF) for providing the logistical
and administrative support for conducting research at
this location. The work was funded by The Wildlife
Conservation Society, Rufford Foundation and
British Ecological Society.
History
Citation
Mires and Peat, 2018, Volume 22, Article 02, 1–13
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING/School of Geography, Geology and the Environment/Physical Geography
Version
VoR (Version of Record)
Published in
Mires and Peat
Publisher
International Mire Conservation Group and International Peat Society