posted on 2019-04-11, 11:10authored byP Almond, H Connolly
We offer a defence of, and framework for, comparative research in industrial and employment
relations, based on a long-term engagement with the social contexts under study. We locate
‘slow’ research strategies in relation to predominant approaches and establish a number of basic
precepts of slow comparativism as a practical methodological approach. We aim to provoke a
discussion among those conducting comparative research on work and employment about how
truth claims are generated. We also seek a basis by which those conducting slower forms of
comparativism, through what we term ‘implicit ethnographies’, can find better ways of developing
and defending their modes of research within an often hostile academic political economy.
Funding
The arguments presented here are based on reflections from research funded by the ESRC (RES-062-23-1886 and ES/N007883/1) and British Academy (MD160030).
History
Citation
European Journal of Industrial Relations, 2019, pp. 1-16
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/School of Business