posted on 2017-08-18, 10:12authored byDan Jackson, Sylwia Bujkiewicz, Martin Law, Richard D. Riley, Ian R. White
Random-effects meta-analyses are very commonly used in medical statistics. Recent methodological developments include multivariate (multiple outcomes) and network (multiple treatments) meta-analysis. Here, we provide a new model and corresponding estimation procedure for multivariate network meta-analysis, so that multiple outcomes and treatments can be included in a single analysis. Our new multivariate model is a direct extension of a univariate model for network meta-analysis that has recently been proposed. We allow two types of unknown variance parameters in our model, which represent between-study heterogeneity and inconsistency. Inconsistency arises when different forms of direct and indirect evidence are not in agreement, even having taken between-study heterogeneity into account. However, the consistency assumption is often assumed in practice and so we also explain how to fit a reduced model which makes this assumption. Our estimation method extends several other commonly used methods for meta-analysis, including the method proposed by DerSimonian and Laird (1986). We investigate the use of our proposed methods in the context of both a simulation study and a real example.
Funding
DJ, IRW, and ML are (or were) employed by the UK Medical Research Council [Unit Programme number U105260558]. SB was supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC) Methodology Research Programme [New Investigator Research Grant MR/L009854/1].
History
Citation
Biometrics, 2017
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/School of Medicine/Department of Health Sciences
Web appendices referenced in Sections 2, 4, and 5 are available
with this article at the Biometrics website on Wiley Online
Library. Computing codes are also available.