A miracle of measurement or accidental constructivism? How PLS subverts the realist search for truth

Purpose: This study aims to determine whether partial least squares path modeling (PLS) is fit for purpose for scholars holding scientific realist views. Design/methodology/approach: The authors present the philosophical foundations of scientific realism and constructivism and examine the extent to which PLS aligns with them. Findings: PLS does not align with scientific realism but aligns well with constructivism. Research limitations/implications: Research is needed to assess PLS’s fit with instrumentalism and pragmatism. Practical implications: PLS has no utility as a realist scientific tool but may be of interest to constructivists. Originality/value: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to assess PLS’s alignments and mismatches with constructivist and scientific realist perspectives.