University of Leicester
Browse

A multicentre prospective randomized equivalence trial of a soft bandage and immediate discharge versus current treatment with rigid immobilization for torus fractures of the distal radius in children: protocol for the Forearm Fracture Recovery in Children Evaluation (FORCE) trial.

Download (233.49 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2020-11-30, 14:43 authored by Juul Achten, Ruth Knight, Susan J Dutton, Matthew L Costa, James Mason, Melina Dritsaki, Duncan Appelbe, Shrouk Messahel, Damian Roland, James Widnall, Daniel C Perry
Aims
Torus fractures are the most common childhood fracture, accounting for 500,000 UK emergency attendances per year. UK treatment varies widely due to lack of scientific evidence. This is the protocol for a randomized controlled equivalence trial of ‘the offer of a soft bandage and immediate discharge’ versus ‘rigid immobilization and follow-up as per the protocol of the treating centre’ in the treatment of torus fractures .

Methods
Children aged four to 15-years-old inclusive who have sustained a torus/buckle fracture of the distal radius with/without an injury to the ulna are eligible to take part. Baseline pain as measured by the Wong Baker FACES pain scale, function using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper limb, and quality of life (QoL) assessed with the EuroQol EQ-5D-Y will be collected. Each patient will be randomly allocated (1:1, stratified by centre and age group (four to seven years and ≥ eight years) to either a regimen of the offer of a soft bandage and immediate discharge or rigid immobilization and follow-up as per the protocol of the treating centre.

Results
At day one, three, and seven, data on pain, function, QoL, immobilization, and analgesia will be collected. Three and six weeks after injury, the main outcomes plus data on complications, resource use, and school absence will be collected. The primary outcome is the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale at three days post-randomization. All data will be obtained through electronic questionnaires completed by the participants and/or parents/guardian.

History

Citation

Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:214–221.

Author affiliation

Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Bone & joint open

Volume

1

Issue

6

Pagination

214 - 221

Publisher

British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery

eissn

2633-1462

Copyright date

2020

Available date

2020-10-14

Spatial coverage

England

Language

eng

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC