posted on 2020-11-19, 15:57authored byAlan Desmond
This paper undertakes a sceptical analysis of the significance for the protection of migrants’ rights represented by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2030 and the UN Global Compact for Migration (GCM). Despite the positive view taken by many of these frameworks, I argue that, taken together, the SDGs and the GCM represent an acknowledgement of the failure of the international system of human rights protection to deal effectively with the protection of migrants’ rights. With particular reference to the UN Migrant Workers Convention, I argue that adoption of the GCM underscores a decisive shift from the realm of binding international law to soft law for the purposes of dealing with migrants’ rights. While acknowledging some of the signal benefits of this new regime, I highlight some of the many signs suggesting that these twin international developments do not guarantee progress on the road to the protection of migrants’ rights.
History
Citation
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 16 , Special Issue 3: Migrants' Rights Finally Front and Centre of the International Agenda? Exploring the Perils and Possibilities of the SDGs and the GCM , September 2020 , pp. 222 - 238
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552320000282
Author affiliation
School of Law
Version
AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Published in
International Journal of Law in Context
Volume
16
Issue
Special Issue 3: Migrants' Rights Finally Front and Centre of the International Agenda? Exploring the Perils and Possibilities of the SDGs and the GCM