posted on 2015-02-11, 14:21authored bySebastian Peyer
The growth of private antitrust litigation in the courts of the Member States creates tensions
between claimants and competition authorities. Claimants seek access to confidential records held
by the authorities while the competition authorities try to maintain the confidentiality of those files.
This paper analyses the two main access routes to confidential information in the files of
competition authorities in the EU. It first looks at access under Regulation 1049/2001 (Transparency
Regulation). Then, the paper assesses the framework for disclosure in the national courts, analysing
the Court of Justice’s Pfleiderer and Donau Chemie decisions, its application in England and
Germany, and the changes that are required with the adoption of the Damages Directive. This
author finds that both access routes tend to favour the protection of authority files and that access‐
seeking parties face high legal thresholds for the disclosure of files and leniency documents. I will
argue that the raised standard for access demonstrates a policy change regarding private antitrust
enforcement. EU policy makers and the courts have begun to moderate the principle of effective
redress as expressed in Courage and Manfredi. In order to minimise repercussions for public
enforcement they reduce the incentives for claimants to bring follow‐on damages actions.
Funding
With support of the ABA Section of Antitrust Law Scholar in Residence Programme.
History
Citation
Journal of Antitrust Enforcement (2015)
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF ARTS, HUMANITIES AND LAW/School of Law