University of Leicester
Browse
NW - Accounting for Ethics.pdf (323.66 kB)

Accounting for ethics: towards a de-humanised comparative approach

Download (323.66 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2018-03-26, 09:44 authored by Natasha E. Whiteman
In rejecting the ultimate authority of proceduralised ethics and instead emphasising the ongoing complexity of ethical manoeuvring, writing on ethics-as-process often presents the individual researcher as the authentic locus of ethical practice. This article seeks to distance from such humanist tendencies. It aims to shift attention away from the experience of the ethical researcher to consider, rather, the fixing of ethical stances in accounts of activity. Arguing for a comparative approach to the empirical, accounts of two different activities are examined: online research and online media consumption. A framework for describing the anchoring of ethical positions across these texts is introduced, one that challenges the achievement of ethical ‘security’ in research. It is argued that claims that the researcher is an authentic point of access to an ethical truth must give way to a consideration of the modes by which ethical claims are made.

History

Citation

Qualitative Research, 2017

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/Department of Media, Communication and Sociology

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Qualitative Research

Publisher

SAGE Publications

issn

1468-7941

eissn

1741-3109

Acceptance date

2017-07-10

Copyright date

2017

Available date

2018-03-26

Publisher version

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1468794117724499

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC