posted on 2015-11-24, 09:45authored byJoanna B. M. Phoenix
The main aim of this article is to provoke a debate about the ways in which state responses to youth crime are constituted as objects of knowledge in youth criminology. The article critiques two dominant approaches in youth criminology (youth crime governance and youth justice studies) in relation to the extent by which they are able to open the theoretical space to distinguish the conditions of possibility and analyse change. The main contention of the article is that in order to address these issues, the concept of ‘youth justice’ needs to be abandoned in favour of the development of a critical youth penality.
History
Citation
British Journal of Criminology, 2015, Published before print
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/Department of Criminology
The file associated with this record is under a 24-month embargo from publication in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy, available at http://www.oxfordjournals.org/en/access-purchase/rights-and-permissions/self-archiving-policye.html. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.