University of Leicester
Browse

Alternative Dispute Resolution During the Covid-19 Crisis and Beyond

Download (455.81 kB)
Version 2 2022-03-28, 14:47
Version 1 2020-11-19, 16:28
journal contribution
posted on 2022-03-28, 14:46 authored by Masood Ahmed
The civil justice system has reacted with unprecedented speed to the Covid-19 crisis to ensure that the courts continue to provide a vital public service in the administration of justice. The government’s measures of social distancing1 to tackle the spread of Covid-19 has meant that only the most critical hearings have been taking place in person.2 In adjusting to the new default position of remote hearings, the civil justice system has experienced a substantial and significant procedural change in the increased use of technology to help facilitate remote hearings and to support the judicial case management of disputes.3 This is not to suggest that the Covid-19 crisis alone has led to the increased use of technology, although there is no doubt that it is a major catalyst.

History

Citation

King's Law Journal Volume 32, 2021 - Issue 1: Covid-19: Political Responses and Legal Consequences, pp. 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2021.1886651

Author affiliation

School of Law

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Kings Law Journal

Volume

21

Issue

1

Pagination

147-156

Publisher

Taylor & Francis (Routledge)

issn

0961-5768

Acceptance date

2020-10-27

Copyright date

2021

Available date

2022-03-28

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC