posted on 2015-05-22, 11:47authored byTimothy J. Ragan, Rasmus H. Fogh, Roberto Tejero, Wim Vranken, Gaetano T. Montelione, Antonio Rosato, Geerten W. Vuister
We performed a comprehensive structure validation of both automated and manually
generated structures of the 10 targets of the CASD-NMR-2013 effort. We established that
automated structure determination protocols are capable of reliably producing structures of
comparable accuracy and quality to those generated by a skilled researcher, at least for small,
single domain proteins such as the ten targets tested. The most robust results appear to be
obtained when NOESY peak lists are used either as the primary input data or to augment
Chemical Shift (CS) data without the need to manually filter such lists. A detailed analysis of
the long-range NOE restraints generated by the different programs from the same data
showed a surprisingly low degree of overlap. Additionally, we found that there was no
significant correlation between the extent of the NOE restraint overlap and the accuracy of
the structure. This result was surprising given the importance of NOE data in producing good
quality structures. We suggest that this could be explained by the information redundancy
present in NOEs between atoms contained within a fixed covalent network.
History
Citation
Journal of Biomolecular NMR, (2015) 62:527–540
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/School of Biological Sciences/Department of Biochemistry