posted on 2016-12-02, 10:42authored byOliver J. T. Harris
The growing interest in assemblages has already opened up a number of important lines of enquiry in
archaeology from the morphogenetic capacities of matter through to a rethinking of the concept of
community. In this paper I want to explore how assemblages allow us to reconceptualise the critical
issue of scale. Archaeologists have vacillated between expending energy on the ‘great processes’ of
change like the evolution of humanity, the colonisation of the globe or the origins of agriculture, and
focussing on the momentary, fleeting nature of a small-scale ethnographic present. Where
archaeologists have attempted to integrate different scales the result has usually been to turn to
Annales influenced or time perspectivism-driven approaches and their fixed, linear, and ontologically
incompatible layers of history. In contrast, I will use assemblages to examine how we can rethink both
the emergence of multiple scales, and their role in history, without reducing the differences of the
small-scale to an epiphenomenal outcome of larger events, or treating large-scale historical processes
as mere reifications of the ‘real’ on-the-ground stuff of daily life. As we will see, this approach also has
consequences for the particular kind of reality we accord to large-scale archaeological categories.
History
Citation
Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 2017, 27(1), pp. 127-139
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/School of Archaeology and Ancient History/Core Staff
Version
AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Published in
Cambridge Archaeological Journal
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP) for McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research