University of Leicester
Browse
jama_Bello_2017_oi_170035.pdf (2.33 MB)

Assessment of Global Kidney Health Care Status.

Download (2.33 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-08-30, 09:19 authored by AK Bello, A Levin, M Tonelli, IG Okpechi, J Feehally, D Harris, K Jindal, BL Salako, A Rateb, MA Osman, B Qarni, S Saad, M Lunney, N Wiebe, F Ye, DW Johnson
Importance: Kidney disease is a substantial worldwide clinical and public health problem, but information about available care is limited. Objective: To collect information on the current state of readiness, capacity, and competence for the delivery of kidney care across countries and regions of the world. Design, Setting, and Participants: Questionnaire survey administered from May to September 2016 by the International Society of Nephrology (ISN) to 130 ISN-affiliated countries with sampling of key stakeholders (national nephrology society leadership, policy makers, and patient organization representatives) identified by the country and regional nephrology leadership through the ISN. Main Outcomes and Measures: Core areas of country capacity and response for kidney care. Results: Responses were received from 125 of 130 countries (96%), including 289 of 337 individuals (85.8%, with a median of 2 respondents [interquartile range, 1-3]), representing an estimated 93% (6.8 billion) of the world's population of 7.3 billion. There was wide variation in country readiness, capacity, and response in terms of service delivery, financing, workforce, information systems, and leadership and governance. Overall, 119 (95%), 95 (76%), and 94 (75%) countries had facilities for hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation, respectively. In contrast, 33 (94%), 16 (45%), and 12 (34%) countries in Africa had facilities for hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation, respectively. For chronic kidney disease (CKD) monitoring in primary care, serum creatinine with estimated glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria measurements were reported as always available in only 21 (18%) and 9 (8%) countries, respectively. Hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and transplantation services were funded publicly and free at the point of care delivery in 50 (42%), 48 (51%), and 46 (49%) countries, respectively. The number of nephrologists was variable and was low (<10 per million population) in Africa, the Middle East, South Asia, and Oceania and South East Asia (OSEA) regions. Health information system (renal registry) availability was limited, particularly for acute kidney injury (8 countries [7%]) and nondialysis CKD (9 countries [8%]). International acute kidney injury and CKD guidelines were reportedly accessible in 52 (45%) and 62 (52%) countries, respectively. There was relatively low capacity for clinical studies in developing nations. Conclusions and Relevance: This survey demonstrated significant interregional and intraregional variability in the current capacity for kidney care across the world, including important gaps in services and workforce. Assuming the responses accurately reflect the status of kidney care in the respondent countries, the findings may be useful to inform efforts to improve the quality of kidney care worldwide.

Funding

This work was supported by the International Society of Nephrology (grant RES0033080 to University of Alberta).

History

Citation

Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2017, 317 (18), pp. 1864-1881

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation

Source

ISN Global Kidney Policy Forum; Mexico City, Mexico.

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

eissn

1538-3598

Acceptance date

2017-04-04

Copyright date

2017

Available date

2019-08-30

Publisher version

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2623225

Temporal coverage: start date

2017-04-21

Temporal coverage: end date

2017-04-21

Language

en