University of Leicester
Browse
- No file added yet -

Asymptotic power of the sphericity test under weak and strong factors in a fixed effects panel data model

Download (220.88 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2017-11-09, 14:57 authored by Badi H. Baltagi, Chihwa Kao, Fa Wang
This paper studies the asymptotic power for the sphericity test in a fixed effect panel data model proposed by Baltagi et al. (2011 Baltagi, B. H., Feng, Q., Kao, C. (2011). Testing for sphericity in a fixed effects panel data model. Econometrics Journal 14:25–47.), (JBFK). This is done under the alternative hypotheses of weak and strong factors. By weak factors, we mean that the Euclidean norm of the vector of the factor loadings is O(1). By strong factors, we mean that the Euclidean norm of the vector of factor loadings is , where n is the number of individuals in the panel. To derive the limiting distribution of JBFK under the alternative, we first derive the limiting distribution of its raw data counterpart. Our results show that, when the factor is strong, the test statistic diverges in probability to infinity as fast as Op(nT). However, when the factor is weak, its limiting distribution is a rightward mean shift of the limit distribution under the null. Second, we derive the asymptotic behavior of the difference between JBFK and its raw data counterpart. Our results show that when the factor is strong, this difference is as large as Op(n). In contrast, when the factor is weak, this difference converges in probability to a constant. Taken together, these results imply that when the factor is strong, JBFK is consistent, but when the factor is weak, JBFK is inconsistent even though its asymptotic power is nontrivial.

History

Citation

Taylor & Francis, 2017, 36 (6-9), pp. 853-882 (30)

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/Department of Economics

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Taylor & Francis

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

issn

0747-4938

eissn

1532-4168

Copyright date

2017

Available date

2018-03-24

Publisher version

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07474938.2017.1307580

Notes

The file associated with this record is under embargo until 12 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.

Language

en