posted on 2019-05-08, 10:17authored byJ Różycka-Tra, J Piotrowski, M Żemojtel-Piotrowska, P Jurek, E Osin, B Adams, R Ardi, S Baltatescu, A Bhomi, S Bogomaz, J Cieciuch, A Clinton, G de Clunie, A Czarna, S Esteves, V Gouveia, M Halik, N Kachatryan, S Kamble, A Kawula, M Klicperova-Baker, A Kospakov, E Letovancova, V Lun, S Malo Cerrato, S Muelbacher, M Nikolic, A Pankratova, J Park, E Paspalanova, G Pék, P Perez de Leon, I Poláčková Šolcová, W Shahbaz, K Truong Thi, H Tiliouine, A Van Hiel, M Vauclair, E Wills-Herrera, A Włodarczyk, I Yagiyaev, J Maltby
This article presents a short research report on the relationship between perceived
antagonism in social relations measured using the Belief in a Zero-Sum Game (BZSG)
scale, life satisfaction, and positive and negative affect. Given that individuals who
believe that life is like a zero-sum game are likely to perceive their daily interactions
with others as unfair, we expected that individuals with high BZSG experience more
negative affect and fewer positive one, resulting in a lower satisfaction with life. In
addition, we examined whether country-level BZSG may play a moderating role in
these associations. Data were collected from student samples (N = 7,146) in 35
countries. Multilevel modelling revealed that perceived social antagonism in social
relations is negatively associated with satisfaction with life and that this relationship is
mediated by both positive and negative affect at the individual level. The relation of
individual BZSG and negative affect on satisfaction with life were weaker in societies
with higher country-level BZSG, suggesting that the effects of BZSG may be less
detrimental in these countries. These findings extend previous knowledge about
predictors of life satisfaction and suggest that social beliefs might also be an important
factor that influences subjective well-being. The contribution of the study is that the
separate treatment of life satisfaction and positive and negative affect may be helpful in
many research situations, particularly from a cross-cultural perspective.
Funding
The work of Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska and Jarosław Piotrowski was supported by
NCN 2016/21/B/HS6/01069. The work of Evgeny Osin was supported by the Russian
Academic Excellence project “5-100”. The work of Truong Thi Khanh Ha was funded by
grants 501.01-2016.02 from the Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology
Development (NAFOSTED)
History
Citation
Current Psychology, 2019
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/Biological Sciences/Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour