posted on 2016-12-05, 16:43authored byVanessa Beck
This paper discusses the issue of choice as it applies to long-term unemployed
and vulnerable individuals. It argues that the combination of poor employment
opportunities, requirements, compulsions and sanctions has not merely reduced
available choice for individuals with multiple barriers to re-/join the labour
market but has also resulted in curtailed decision-making abilities when it comes
to their pathways into employment. The outcomes can include protective
resistance as a response to the extent of regulation, which may undermine
engagement in job search and related activities. Despite attempts by benevolent
staff in a charity to provide support and enhance capabilities that result in the
overcoming of protective resistance, they operate within a broader institutional
framework of choice as set by government policy. The end result is compulsion,
not choice.
History
Citation
Work, Employment and Society, 2017
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/School of Management
Version
AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Published in
Work
Publisher
SAGE Publications (UK and US) for British Sociological Association