posted on 2021-03-18, 12:45authored bySE Inzucchi, K Khunti, DH Fitchett, C Wanner, M Mattheus, JT George, AP Ofstad, B Zinman
Context
Control of multiple cardiovascular (CV) risk factors reduces CV events in individuals with type 2 diabetes.
Objective
To investigate this association in a contemporary clinical trial population, including how CV risk factor control affects the CV benefits of empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor.
Design
Post hoc analysis.
Setting
Randomized CV outcome trial (EMPA-REG OUTCOME).
Participants
Type 2 diabetes patients with established CV disease.
Intervention
Empagliflozin or placebo.
Main Outcome Measures
Risk of CV outcomes—including the treatment effect of empagliflozin—by achieving 7 goals for CV risk factor control at baseline: (1) glycated hemoglobin <7.5%, (2) low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dL or statin use, (3) systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, (4) pharmacological renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade, (5) normoalbuminuria, (6) aspirin use, (7) nonsmoking.
Results
In the placebo group, the hazard ratio (HR) for CV death was 4.00 (95% CI, 2.26–7.11) and 2.48 (95% CI, 1.52–4.06) for patients achieving only 0–3 or 4–5 risk factor goals at baseline, respectively, compared with those achieving 6–7 goals. Participants achieving 0–3 or 4–5 goals also had increased risk for the composite outcome of hospitalization for heart failure or CV death (excluding fatal stroke) (HR 2.89 [1.82–4.57] and 1.90 [1.31–2.78], respectively) and 3-point major adverse CV events (HR 2.21 [1.53–3.19] and 1.42 [1.06–1.89]). Empagliflozin significantly reduced these outcomes across all risk factor control categories (P > 0.05 for treatment-by-subgroup interactions).
Conclusions
Cardiovascular risk in EMPA-REG OUTCOME was inversely associated with baseline CV risk factor control. Empagliflozin’s cardioprotective effect was consistent regardless of multiple baseline risk factor control.
History
Citation
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Volume 105, Issue 9, September 2020, Pages 3025–3035, https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa321
Author affiliation
Diabetes Research Centre, College of Life Sciences
Version
VoR (Version of Record)
Published in
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
Volume
105
Issue
9
Pagination
3025-3035
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP) for Endocrine Society