University of Leicester
Browse

Central banks’ forecasts and their bias: Evidence, effects and explanation

Download (1.29 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2015-12-23, 13:42 authored by Wojciech Charemza, Daniel Ladley
Through empirical analysis this paper shows that inflation forecasts produced for monetary policy councils in inflation targeting countries may be subject to bias towards the target. There is no clear evidence of such bias for other inflation forecasts. To explain this observation a model is constructed to analyse the effectiveness of monetary policy committee voting when the inflation forecast signals, upon which decisions are based, may be subject to manipulation. Using a discrete time intertemporal model, we examine the distortions resulting from such manipulation under a three-way voting system. We find that voting itself creates persistence and volatility in inflation. In the case when the expected value of the inflation distribution is not far from the target, alterations to the forecast signal, even if well intentioned, results in a diminished probability of achieving the inflation target and an increase in persistence. However, if committee members ‘learn’ in a Bayesian manner, this problem is mitigated.

Funding

This work was supported by the joint Economic and Social Science Council and Open Research Area project Probabilistic Approach to Assessing Macroeconomic Uncertainties No. RES-360- 25-0003. This research used the ALICE High Performance Computing Facility at the University of Leicester

History

Citation

International Journal of Forecasting, 2016, 32,(3), pp. 804–817

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/Department of Economics

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

International Journal of Forecasting

Publisher

Elsevier for International Institute of Forecasters

issn

0169-2070

Available date

2018-04-18

Publisher version

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169207016300048

Notes

JEL codes: E47, E52, E58;The file associated with this record is under embargo until 24 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC