University of Leicester
Browse
aja.119.1.0103.pdf (324.99 kB)

Characterizing Roman Artifacts to Investigate Gendered Practices in Contexts Without Sexed Bodies

Download (324.99 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2015-06-29, 11:46 authored by Penelope M. Allison
This article concerns the characterization of Roman artifacts so that they can play a greater role in gendered approaches to Roman sites—sites that constitute lived spaces but lack actual references to sexed bodies. It commences with a brief discussion on gendered approaches in the two main strands of Roman archaeology—classical and provincial. Within the differing frameworks of the wider disciplines of classics and archaeology, both strands focus on contexts with sexed bodies—burials, figurative representation, and inscriptions. The discussion serves as a background for more integrated and more interrogative approaches to relationships between Roman artifacts and gendered practices, approaches that aim to develop interpretative tools for investigating social practice in contexts where no representational or biologically sexed bodies are evident. Three types of artifacts—brooches, glass bottles, and needles—are used to demonstrate how differing degrees of gender associations of artifacts and artifact assemblages can provide insights into gender relationships in settlement contexts. These insights in turn contribute to better understandings of gendered sociospatial practices across the Roman world.

History

Citation

American Journal of Archaeology, 2015, 119 (1), pp. 103-123

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF ARTS, HUMANITIES AND LAW/School of Archaeology and Ancient History

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

American Journal of Archaeology

Publisher

Archaeological Institute of America

issn

0002-9114

eissn

1939-828X

Copyright date

2015

Available date

2015-06-29

Publisher version

http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3764/aja.119.1.0103

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC