posted on 2017-11-01, 15:22authored byThomas M. MacDonald, Bryan Williams, David J. Webb, Steve Morant, Mark Caulfield, J. Kennedy Cruikshank, Ian Ford, Peter Sever, Isla S. Mackenzie, Sandosh Padmanabhan, Gerald P. McCann, Jackie Salisbury, Gordon McInnes, Morris J. Brown, The British Hypertension Society programme of Prevention And Treatment of Hypertension With Algorithm based Therapy (PATHWAY).
Background
Guidelines for hypertension vary in their preference between Initial combination therapy and
initial monotherapy, stratified by patient profile. We therefore compared the efficacy and
tolerability of these approaches.
Methods and Results
We performed a 1-year double-blind, randomised, controlled trial in 605 untreated patients
aged 18-79, systolic BP ≥ 150 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 95 mmHg. In phase 1 (weeks 0-16),
patients were randomly assigned to initial monotherapy (losartan 50-100 mg, or
hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5-25 mg crossing over at 8 weeks), or initial combination
(losartan 50-100 mg + HCTZ 12.5-25 mg). In phase 2 (weeks 17-32), all patients received
losartan 100 mg and HCTZ 12.5-25 mg. In phase 3 (weeks 33-52), amlodipine ± doxazosin
could be added to achieve target BP. Hierarchical primary outcomes were the difference
from baseline in home systolic BP (HSBP), averaged over phase 1 & 2 and, if significant, at
32 weeks. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, and difference in HSBP
responses between tertiles of plasma renin. HSBP after initial monotherapy fell 4.9 mmHg
(3.7, 6.0) less over 32 weeks (p <0.001) than after initial combination, but caught up at 32
weeks, (difference 1.2 mmHg (-0.4 to 2.8), p = 0.13). In phase 1, HSBP response to each
monotherapy differed substantially between renin tertiles, whereas response to combination
therapy was uniform, and at least 5 mmHg more than to monotherapy. There were no
difference in withdrawals due to adverse events.
Conclusions
Initial combination therapy can be recommended for patients with blood pressure >150/95
mmHg.
Funding
The study was funded by a special project grant from the British Heart Foundation (number
SP/08/002). Further funding was provided by National Institute of Health Research
Comprehensive Local Research Networks.
BW, PS, MC and MJB are NIHR Senior Investigators. BW is supported by the NIHR
UCL/UCL Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. MC is supported by the NIHR
Cardiovascular Biomedical research Unit at St Bartholomew's Hospital, London. GPM is
supported by NIHR Research Fellowship.
History
Citation
Journal of the American Heart Association, 2017, 6:e006986
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/School of Medicine/Department of Cardiovascular Sciences
Version
VoR (Version of Record)
Published in
Journal of the American Heart Association
Publisher
Wiley, American Heart Association, American Stroke Association