University of Leicester
Browse
Comparative Analysis of Isochoric and Isobaric Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage.pdf (1.92 MB)

Comparative Analysis of Isochoric and Isobaric Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage

Download (1.92 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-19, 09:54 authored by D Pottie, B Cardenas, S Garvey, J Rouse, E Hough, A Bagdanavicius, E Barbour

Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage (ACAES) is regarded as a promising, grid scale, medium-to-long duration energy storage technology. In ACAES, the air storage may be isochoric (constant volume) or isobaric (constant pressure). Isochoric storage, wherein the internal pressure cycles between an upper and lower limit as the system charges and discharges is mechanically simpler, however, it leads to undesirable thermodynamic consequences which are detrimental to the ACAES overall performance. Isobaric storage can be a valuable alternative: the storage volume varies to offset the pressure and temperature changes that would otherwise occur as air mass enters or leaves the high-pressure storage. In this paper we develop a thermodynamic model based on expected ACAES and existing CAES system features to compare the effects of isochoric and isobaric storage. Importantly, off-design compressor performance due to the sliding storage pressure is included by using a second degree polynomial fit for the isentropic compressor efficiency. For our modelled systems, the isobaric system round-trip efficiency (RTE) reaches 61.5%. The isochoric system achieves 57.8% even when no compressor off-design performance decrease is taken into account. This fact is associated to inherent losses due to throttling and mixing of heat stored at different temperatures. In our base-case scenario where the isentropic compressor efficiency varies between (Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.), the isochoric system RTE is approximately 10% lower than the isobaric. These results indicate that isobaric storage for CAES is worth further development. We suggest that subsequent work investigate the exergy flows as well as the scalability challenges with isobaric storage mechanisms.

Funding

Sustainable, Affordable and Viable Compressed Air Energy Storage (SAVE-CAES)

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Find out more...

History

Author affiliation

School of Engineering, University of Leicester

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Energies

Volume

16

Issue

6

Pagination

2646

Publisher

MDPI

eissn

1996-1073

Copyright date

2023

Available date

2023-05-19

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC