University of Leicester
Browse

Contrasting controls on tree ring isotope variation for Amazon floodplain and terra firme trees.

Download (1.64 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-06-19, 08:45 authored by BBL Cintra, M Gloor, A Boom, J Schöngart, GM Locosselli, R Brienen
Isotopes in tropical trees rings can improve our understanding of tree responses to climate. We assessed how climate and growing conditions affect tree-ring oxygen and carbon isotopes (δ18OTR and δ13CTR) in four Amazon trees. We analysed within-ring isotope variation for two terra firme (non-flooded) and two floodplain trees growing at sites with varying seasonality. - We find distinct intra-annual patterns of δ18OTR and δ13CTR driven mostly by seasonal variation in weather and source water δ18O. Seasonal variation in isotopes was lowest for the tree growing under the wettest conditions. Tree ring cellulose isotope models based on existing theory reproduced well observed within-ring variation with possible contributions of both stomatal and mesophyll conductance to variation in δ13CTR. - Climate analysis reveal that terra firme δ18OTR signals were related to basin-wide precipitation indicating a source water δ18O influence, while floodplain trees recorded leaf enrichment effects related to local climate. Thus, intrinsically different processes (source water vs leaf enrichment) affect δ18OTR in the two different species analysed. These differences are likely a result of both species-specific traits and of the contrasting growing conditions in the floodplains and terra firme environments. - Simultaneous analysis of δ13CTR and δ18OTR support this interpretation as it shows strongly similar intra-annual patterns for both isotopes in the floodplain trees arising from a common control by leaf stomatal conductance, while terra firme trees showed less covariation between the two isotopes. Our results are interesting from a plant physiological perspective and have implications for climate reconstructions as trees record intrinsically different processes.

Funding

This work was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – Brazil (CNPq Universal 457423/2014-5), by Research Councils UK/Natural Environment Research Council (Newton Fund grant NE/M02203X/1 and Amazon Hydrological Cycle grant NE/K01353X/1). B.B.L.C. received a scholarship from CNPq (Science Without Borders 207400/2014-8). G.M.L. received a scholarship from the Fundação de Amparo á Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo – Brazil (FAPESP, 2015/25511-3)

History

Citation

Tree Physiology, 2019, tpz009

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING/School of Geography, Geology and the Environment/Physical Geography

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Tree Physiology

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

eissn

1758-4469

Acceptance date

2019-01-15

Copyright date

2019

Available date

2019-06-19

Publisher version

https://academic.oup.com/treephys/advance-article/doi/10.1093/treephys/tpz009/5368478

Notes

Supplementary Data for this article are available at Tree Physiology Online.

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC