University of Leicester
Browse

Credibility, authenticity and voice: dilemmas in online interviewing

Download (315.48 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2009-12-08, 16:27 authored by Nalita James, Hugh Busher
This paper explores the methodological issues encountered when using email as a web-based interview in on-line qualitative research. By drawing on two separate research studies that used this method to explore participants’ understandings of their professional experiences and developing professional identities, the researchers consider the methodological implications in using this approach. These include issues affecting the credibility and trustworthiness of the research design of the studies and issues around the authenticity of participants’ voices and how that was affected by power and control in the interview process. Despite these dilemmas, the paper recognises the contribution that web-based approaches can make to research by allowing researchers to hold asynchronous conversations with participants, especially when they are distant from the researcher, and to generating reflective, descriptive data. It leads us to conclude that it is worth refining our methodological framework to strengthen the trustworthiness and credibility of future research studies that use email.

History

Citation

Qualitative Research, 2006, 6 (3), pp.403-420

Published in

Qualitative Research

issn

1468-7941

eissn

1741-3109

Available date

2009-12-08

Publisher version

http://qrj.sagepub.com/content/6/3/403

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC