posted on 2007-06-21, 08:40authored byAndrew M. Colman
South African courts have recently accepted social psychological phenomena as extenuating factors in murder trials. In one important case, eight railway workers were convicted of murdering four strike-breakers during an industrial dispute; the court accepted conformity, obedience, group polarization, deindividuation, bystander apathy, and other well-established psychological phenomena as extenuating factors for four of the eight defendants but sentenced the others to death. In a second trial, death sentences on five defendants for the “necklace” killing of a young woman were reduced to 20 months’ imprisonment in the light of similar social psychological evidence. Practical and ethical issues arising from expert psychological testimony are discussed.
History
Citation
American Psychologist, 1991, 46, pp.1071-1079.
Published in
American Psychologist
Publisher
American Psychological Association
Available date
2007-06-21
Notes
'This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.' http://www.apa.org/journals/amp/