posted on 2009-03-26, 11:25authored byDavid Bartram
I compare the treatment of two marginal recipient groups, not commonly regarded as “on welfare,” to that experienced by conventional welfare recipients and argue that we need an understanding of welfare that takes culture more seriously. Public discourse concerning welfare would be more enlightening if we could move beyond hegemonic concepts such as “economic self-sufficiency.” I propose thinking of welfare as a public subsidy for groups whose way of life is incompatible with economic self-sufficiency – an approach that enables us to consider culture explicitly in debates regarding the core populations affected by social policy.
History
Citation
Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 2005, 7 (3), pp.233-247.
This is the author’s final draft of the paper published as Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 2005, 7 (3), pp.233-247. The final published version is available at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/13876988.asp, Doi: 10.1080/13876980500209413.