University of Leicester
Browse

Cyclometalated half-sandwich iridium(iii) and rhodium(iii) complexes as efficient agents against cancer stem-cell mammospheres

Download (1.08 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-03-11, 12:04 authored by Dana Josa, Piedad Herrera-Ramírez, Xiao Feng, Albert Gutiérrez, David Aguilà, Arnald Grabulosa, Manuel Martínez, Kogularamanan SuntharalingamKogularamanan Suntharalingam, Patrick Gamez

Four cyclometalated complexes, namely [IrCl(η5 -pentamethylcyclopendadienyl)(k2 C-diphenyl(1-pyrenyl) phosphane)] (1) and [RhCl(η5 -pentamethylcyclopendadienyl)(k2 C-diphenyl(1-pyrenyl)phosphane)] (2), and their DMSO-coordinated counterparts [Ir(η5 -pentamethylcyclopendadienyl)(kS-dmso)(k2 C-diphenyl(1- pyrenyl)phosphane)]PF6 (1·DMSO) and [Rh(η5 -pentamethylcyclopendadienyl)(kS-dmso)(k2 C-diphenyl(1- pyrenyl)phosphane)]PF6 (2·DMSO), were synthesized and fully characterized, including their single-crystal X-ray structures. DNA-interacting 1 and 2 exhibits IC50 values in the range 0.53–0.79 µM against bulk breast cancer cells and breast cancer stem cells (CSCs), i.e., HMLER and HMLER-shEcad cells. The complexes are up to seven times more active than salinomycin and up to nine times more active than cisplatin. Moreover, 1 and 2 are very effective (in the micromolar range) against mammospheres obtained from single cell suspensions of HMLER-shEcad cells, 1 being thrice more toxic than 2 and up to 4.5-fold more potent than cisplatin and salinomycin. In depth mechanistic studies revealed that 1 induces necrosis, which is potentially dependent on necrosome formation and independent of ROS concentration. The efficacy of 1 against breast CSCs can be enhanced by co-treatment with PARP-1 inhibitors.

Funding

Immuno-chemotherapeutic Metal Complexes for Cancer Stem Cell-Directed Therapy

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Find out more...

Financial support from the Agència de Gestió dels Ajuts Univeristaris i de Recerca (project 2021-SGR-01107), Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (projects PID2020-115537RB-I00, PID2020-115658GB-I00 and PCI2021-122027-2B, MCIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR) and the RSC (RSC Research Fund grant RF19-7147) is kindly acknowledged. P. G. thanks the Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA). K. S. is supported by an EPSRC New Investigator Award (EP/S005544/1) and the University of Leicester. We also thank the Advanced Imaging Facility (RRID:SCR_020967) at the University of Leicester for support. Crystallographic measurements were performed at BL13-XALOC beamline at ALBA Synchrotron with the collaboration of ALBA staff.

History

Author affiliation

College of Science & Engineering Chemistry

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers

Publisher

Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

issn

2052-1553

eissn

2052-1553

Copyright date

2025

Available date

2025-03-07

Language

en

Deposited by

Mrs Louise Thompson

Deposit date

2025-02-14

Data Access Statement

Data for this article are available at the Universitat de Barcelona Digital Repository at https://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/?locale=en. The data supporting this article have been included as part of the ESI.† Crystallographic data for compounds 1, 2, 1·DMSO and 2·DMSO (CCDC 2390209–2390211†).

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC