University of Leicester
Browse

Deintensification in older patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of approaches, rates and outcomes.

journal contribution
posted on 2019-04-30, 15:24 authored by S Seidu, P Topsever, CE Hambling, FX Cos, K Khunti
BACKGROUND: Guideline bodies recommend less strict glycaemic targets in older people with diabetes. It is uncertain whether the benefits of deintensification or de-prescribing, commonly employed by clinicians to achieve the less strict targets, outweighs the harms in these patients. We conducted a systematic review of published evidence, to assess deintensification approaches and rates and evaluate the harms and benefits of deintensification with antidiabetic medication and other therapies amongst older people (≥ 65 years) with type 2 diabetes with or without cardiometabolic conditions. METHODS: We identified relevant studies in a literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to 30 October 2018. Data was extracted on baseline characteristics, details on deintensification, and outcomes and was synthesized using a narrative approach. RESULTS: Ten studies (observational cohorts and interventional studies) with data on 26,558 patients with comorbidities were eligible. Deintensification approaches included complete withdrawal, discontinuation, reducing dosage, conversion, or substitution of at least one medication, but majority of studies were based on complete withdrawal or discontinuation of antihyperglycaemic medication. Rates of deintensification approaches ranged from 13.4% to 75%. Majority of studies reported no deterioration in HbA1c levels, hypoglycaemic episodes falls or hospitalisation on deintensification. On adverse events and mortality, no significant differences were observed between the comparison groups in the majority of studies. CONCLUSION: Available but limited evidence suggests that the benefits of deintensification outweighs the harms in older people with type 2 diabetes with or without comorbidities. Given the heterogeneity of patients with diabetes, further research is warranted on which deintensification approaches are appropriate and beneficial for each specific patient population.

Funding

This study was initiated and completed independently by the Primary Care Diabetes European Association for the Study of Diabetes with full funding from Primary Care Diabetes Europe (PCDE). PCDE has received corporate sponsorship from Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Astra Zeneca and Roche Diagnostics, but the companies had no input in the study.

History

Citation

Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2019

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Diabetes Research Centre

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Diabetes

Publisher

Wiley

eissn

1463-1326

Acceptance date

2019-03-27

Copyright date

2019

Publisher version

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/dom.13724

Notes

The file associated with this record is under embargo until 12 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC