posted on 2019-08-05, 15:40authored byGonzalo P. Urcelay, Sietse Jonkman
The transition from goal-directed to habitual forms of instrumental behaviour is determined by
variables such as the amount of training, schedules of reinforcement, the availability of choices, and
exposure to drugs of abuse. Less is known about the control of goal-directed behaviour when
reinforcement is delayed rather than immediate. In these experiments, we investigated in rats the role
of response-outcome contiguity on the control of goal-directed action, assessed through satiety-specific outcome devaluation tests. In Experiment 1 using a within-subjects design we observed goal-directed behaviour after six days of FR1 training when the outcome was presented immediately
following the lever press, but not when it was delayed for 20 s, revealing habit formation with delayed
outcomes. Experiment 2 revealed that the habitual control observed with 20 s delays of reinforcement
can be prevented if, immediately before each instrumental training session, the rats were exposed to
the experimental context in the absence of both the lever and reinforcement. In summary, these
experiments suggest that response-outcome contiguity plays an important role in the control of goal-directed actions and habits.
Funding
This study was funded by a Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship (PIEF-GA-2009-237608)
awarded by the European Commission to Gonzalo Urcelay and Jeff Dalley. All or part of these
findings were presented by Urcelay and Jonkman at the Associative Learning Symposium at
Gregynog (Wales, UK), in 2011, and by Urcelay et al., at the International Meeting of the Spanish
Society for Comparative Psychology (Meeting in Avila, 2018).
History
Citation
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 2019
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/Biological Sciences/Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour
Version
AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Published in
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition