University of Leicester
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Reason: This item is currently closed access.

Derivative Actions in China: Law and Practice

journal contribution
posted on 2013-09-18, 11:43 authored by Flora Xiao Huang
This paper concerns one of the thorniest aspects in company law: the derivative action. China’s introduction of the statutory derivative action in 2005 has been a significant experiment to establish an investor-friendly legal regime. As an exception to the rule in Foss v. Harbottle, individual shareholders can, acting on behalf of a company, sue the company’s director if a wrong is done to the company. Chinese companies have been widely conceived as having a blockholder model, in which the state as the controlling shareholder should in theory possess the incentives to constrain the opportunistic behaviour of managers. Nonetheless, the state, as loosely defined as “people as a whole”, has failed to exercise any effective monitoring role. The introduction of derivative actions has illustrated a paradigm shift of governance towards the role of minority shareholders. During the transplantation of Western law, Chinese system distinguishes itself from other jurisdictions due to the underlying market and its legal institutions. This paper will attempt to explore Chinese experiment in derivative actions. The rest of the paper structures as follows. It will examine the rule in Foss v. Harbottle and the exceptions to that rule, and next the debate over the role of derivative actions is discussed. Furthermore, a large body of the paper will present a comprehensive picture of the legal framework of derivative actions in China, followed by the judicial application. Finally, a brief conclusion will be made.

History

Citation

Cambridge Student Law Review, 2010, 6 (1), pp. 246-258

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF ARTS, HUMANITIES AND LAW/School of Law

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Cambridge Student Law Review

Publisher

Cambridge University Press

issn

1750-0893

eissn

1750-0907

Copyright date

2010

Notes

The file associated with this record is embargoed while permission to archive is sought from the publisher. The final published version may be available through the links above.

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC