posted on 2014-09-10, 10:43authored byEmma Jones, Nicholas Lees, Graham Martin, Mary Dixon-Woods
Background: Quality improvement (QI) methods are widely used in surgery in an effort to improve care, often
using techniques such as Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to implement specific interventions. Explicit definition of both
the QI method and quality intervention is necessary to enable the accurate replication of effective interventions in
practice, facilitate cumulative learning, reduce research waste and optimise benefits to patients. This systematic
review aims to assess quality of reporting of QI methods and quality interventions in perioperative care.
Methods: Studies reporting on quality interventions implemented in perioperative care settings will be identified.
Searches will be conducted in the Ovid SP version of Medline, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled
Trials, the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care database and the related articles function of
PubMed. The journal
BMJ Quality
will be searched separately. Search strategy terms will relate to (i) surgery, (ii) QI
and (iii) evaluation methods. Explicit exclusion and inclusion criteria will be applied. Data from studies will be
extracted using a data extraction form. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist
will be used to evaluate quality of reporting, together with additional items aimed at assessing QI methods
specifically.
History
Citation
Systematic Reviews, 2014, 3 : 98
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/School of Medicine/Department of Health Sciences